Text only | Text with Images

Battlezone Universe

Battlezone Universe => Archive Vault => 1.3 Public Beta 5: Tech Alpha 5 => Topic started by: CivBase on June 15, 2009, 03:59:52 PM

Title: PB4
Post by: CivBase on June 15, 2009, 03:59:52 PM
Yah... you're supposed to patch this to pb4, right?  Well, when you guys released ta5, you got rid of all of the pb4 links, so you can't update the original any more.  Can someone please provide a pb4 link?  Thanks.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: mrtwosheds on June 15, 2009, 04:18:05 PM
Ta5 can patch the original CD version, you don't need pb4.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: CivBase on June 15, 2009, 04:22:38 PM
Hmm...

Didn't work when I first tried it when it came out.  Oh well, found a link anyways:

http://www.valler.com/bz2/files/BZ2_v13PublicBeta4a_english.exe (http://www.valler.com/bz2/files/BZ2_v13PublicBeta4a_english.exe)
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: ScarleTomato on June 15, 2009, 07:49:34 PM
if it said something like 'the install didn't work reinstall and repatch' You probably need to uninstall, then actually delete the battlezone folder, then reinstall and patch to ta5

its actually preferred that you install ta5 on an unpatched version
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: General BlackDragon on June 16, 2009, 06:55:45 PM
The patches say to patch over a FRESH BZ2 install. Meaning unpatched.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: Zero Angel on June 17, 2009, 02:48:04 AM
Though that's only the recommendation. It works to patch over even the all-in-one. Still its best to patch it over a fresh install.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: AHadley on June 17, 2009, 05:27:04 AM
Each patch contains the fixes of all those before it, which is why the file size keeps getting bigger.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: General BlackDragon on June 17, 2009, 03:11:37 PM
ZA, whats the data.pak filesize of the "allin one"?
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: Zero Angel on June 17, 2009, 05:21:46 PM
Exactly the same as the data.pak from a fresh BZ2 install (I compared the filesize of both down to the last byte)
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: General BlackDragon on June 17, 2009, 09:03:23 PM
There is some all in one with a pak of like 500 something mb, and causes bad assets when used with 1.3
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: Zero Angel on June 17, 2009, 11:45:59 PM
That would be BZ2Gold you're referring to. Its less popular than the all-in-one.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: General BlackDragon on June 18, 2009, 10:39:47 AM
it needs to be destroyed in a firey pit of hell for breaking the biggest rule of modding.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: cheesepuffly on June 18, 2009, 04:10:21 PM
Quote from: General BlackDragon on June 18, 2009, 10:39:47 AM
it needs to be destroyed in a firey pit of hell for breaking the biggest rule of modding.

What is it, charging for a mod? Not giving credit for something?
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: Warfreak on June 18, 2009, 04:22:59 PM
Its basically a 1.2 MegaPack in which all of the addons were embedded into the data.pak itself.

If i remember correctly it wasn't exactly free of charge to obtain.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: cheesepuffly on June 18, 2009, 04:31:13 PM
Eeeeeegh.... That doesnt sound good.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: General BlackDragon on June 18, 2009, 06:40:44 PM
Yeah. it'd cause bad assets with normal BZ2. == nono.

GSH can probably explain how stupid the person who made it is.
Title: Re: PB4
Post by: cheesepuffly on June 18, 2009, 06:47:28 PM
Quote from: General BlackDragon on June 18, 2009, 06:40:44 PM
Yeah. it'd cause bad assets with normal BZ2. == nono.

GSH can probably explain how stupid the person who made it is.

So can i, "Very"
Text only | Text with Images